iOS take-home assignment

A take-home is graded like production code a reviewer will read, not a puzzle to brute-force. Restraint and clarity beat over-engineering.

How to approach it

Scope tightly to what the brief asks and resist adding features to look impressive. Structure the project so a reviewer can navigate it in minutes, with clear layers, meaningful names, and no dead code. Write a short README explaining your decisions and trade-offs: what you prioritized, what you skipped, and what you would do with more time.

What reviewers reward

Tests on the core logic, even a handful, signal a production mindset and let the reviewer trust your code. Focus them on the parts most likely to break. Readable architecture and honest notes consistently outscore clever abstractions. If you took a shortcut under time pressure, say so; transparency about trade-offs is exactly the judgment the exercise tests.

Go deeper than a summary

Share Your Screen works topics like this through in full: 82 solved Swift problems with tests, 9 case studies (one real round, eight composites), and 7 annotated mock interviews, so you rehearse the live round instead of just reading about it.

Get the book

Secure checkout on Gumroad. Instant PDF and EPUB download. Lifetime updates.

Frequently asked

How much time should a take-home take?

Respect the stated budget. If none is given, aim for a focused submission you can finish in a few hours rather than a sprawling one that signals poor scoping.

Do I need tests in a take-home?

Yes, at least on the core logic. Tests demonstrate a production mindset and give the reviewer confidence in the code.